Being

[vc_row bg_color=""][vc_column width="1/1"][ish_headline tag_size="h3" color="color5"]Being is an extremely broad concept[/ish_headline][vc_column_text]encompassing objective and subjective features of reality and existence. Anything that partakes in being is also called a "being", though often this use is limited to entities that have subjectivity (as in the expression "human being"). So broad a notion has inevitably been elusive and controversial in the history of philosophy, beginning in western philosophy with attempts among the pre-Socratics to deploy it intelligibly.[/vc_column_text][ish_embed]https://0.s3.envato.com/files/77974333/preview.mp3[/ish_embed][vc_column_text align="left"]As an example of efforts in recent times, Martin Heidegger (who himself drew on ancient Greek sources) adopted German terms like Dasein to articulate the topic. Several modern approaches build on such continental European exemplars as Heidegger, and apply metaphysical results to the understanding of human psychology and the human condition generally (notably in the Existentialist tradition).[/vc_column_text][ish_box inner_padding="60#60#30#60"][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width="1/1"][ish_quote author="Lao Tzu" size="h3" align="center"]"Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage."[/ish_quote][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/ish_box][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width="1/1"][ish_headline tag_size="h3" color="color5"]The transcendentals[/ish_headline][vc_column_text]Aristotle's classificatory scheme had included the five predicables, or characteristics that might be predicated of a substance. One of these was the property, an essential universal true of the species, but not in the definition (in modern terms, some examples would be grammatical language, a property of man, or a spectral pattern characteristic of an element, both of which are defined in other ways). Pointing out that predicables are predicated univocally of substances; that is, they refer to "the same thing" found in each instance, St. Thomas argued that whatever can be said about being is not univocal, because all beings are unique, each actuated by a unique existence. It is the analogous possession of an existence that allows them to be identified as being; therefore, being is an analogous predication.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Whatever can be predicated of all things is universal-like but not universal, category-like but not a category. St. Thomas called them (perhaps not originally) the transcendentia, "transcendentals", because they "climb above" the categories, just as being climbs above substance. Later academics also referred to them as "the properties of being." The number is generally three or four.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row vertical_align="middle" bg_color=""][vc_column width="1/2"][ish_box color="none" text_color="none" inner_padding="30#30#30#30"][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width="1/1"][ish_headline tag_size="h4" align="right" color="color5" bottom_margin="half"]The substance theorists[/ish_headline][vc_column_text align="right"]The deficit of such a bridge was first encountered in history by the Pre-Socratic philosophers during.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/ish_box][/vc_column][vc_column width="1/2"][ish_image image="392" size="theme-half" stretch_image="yes" link_type="image" show_caption="yes"][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row vertical_align="middle" bg_color=""][vc_column width="1/2"][ish_image image="181" size="theme-half" stretch_image="yes" link_type="image" show_caption="yes"][/vc_column][vc_column width="1/2"][ish_box color="none" text_color="none" inner_padding="30#30#30#30"][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width="1/1"][ish_headline tag_size="h4" align="left" color="color5" bottom_margin="half"]Act and potency[/ish_headline][vc_column_text]One might expect a solution to follow from such certain language but none does. Instead Aristotle launches.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/ish_box][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Broken

[vc_row bg_color=""][vc_column width="1/1"][vc_row_inner vertical_align="middle"][vc_column_inner width="1/2"][ish_headline align="center" color="color5" bottom_margin="no"]Broken[/ish_headline][ish_headline tag_size="h3" align="center"]A short film[/ish_headline][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width="1/2"][vc_column_text]A short film is any film not long enough to be considered a feature film. No consensus exists as to where that boundary is drawn: the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences defines a short film as "an original motion picture that has a running time of 40 minutes or less, including all credits". The term featurette originally applied to a film longer than a short subject, but shorter than a standard feature film.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width="1/1"][ish_embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kh9RBRzDNPU[/ish_embed][vc_column_text]The increasingly rare term short subject means approximately the same thing. An industry term, it carries more of an assumption that the film is shown as part of a presentation along with a feature film. Short is an abbreviation for either term. Short films are often screened at local, national, or international film festivals and made by independent filmmakers for non profit, either with a low budget or no budget at all. They are usually funded by film grants, non profit organizations, sponsor, or personal funds. Short films are generally used by filmmakers to gain experience and/or prove their talent in order to gain funding for future films from private investors, entertainment companies, or film studios.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row bg_color=""][vc_column width="1/2"][ish_image image="37" size="theme-half" stretch_image="yes" link_type="image"][ish_box color="none" text_color="none" inner_padding="30#30#30#30"][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width="1/1"][ish_headline tag_size="h3" align="left"]Animated cartoons[/ish_headline][vc_column_text]came principally as short subjects. Virtually all major film production companies had units assigned to develop and produce shorts, and many companies.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/ish_box][/vc_column][vc_column width="1/2"][ish_box color="none" text_color="none" inner_padding="30#30#30#30"][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width="1/1"][ish_headline tag_size="h2" align="left"]History[/ish_headline][vc_column_text]A few animated shorts continue within mainstream commercial distribution. For instance, Pixar has screened a short along with each of its feature films during its initial theatrical run since 1995 (producing shorts permanently since 2001).

Since Disney acquired Pixar in 2005, Disney has also produced animated shorts since 2007 with the Goofy short How to Hook Up Your Home Theater and produced a series of live action ones featuring The Muppets for viewing on YouTube as viral videos to promote the 2011 movie of the same name.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/ish_box][ish_image image="201" size="theme-half" stretch_image="yes" link_type="image"][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row bg_color=""][vc_column width="1/1"][ish_headline tag_size="h3" align="left"]Modern era[/ish_headline][vc_column_text]A few animated shorts continue within mainstream commercial distribution. For instance, Pixar has screened a short along with each of its feature films during its initial theatrical run since 1995 (producing shorts permanently since 2001). Since Disney acquired Pixar in 2005, Disney has also produced animated shorts since 2007 with the Goofy short How to Hook Up Your Home Theater and produced a series of live action ones featuring The Muppets for viewing on YouTube as viral videos to promote the 2011 movie of the same name.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]